UK backs Doug Gurr as permanent CMA chair after merger approval streak
Doug Gurr has been named the UK government's preferred candidate to remain as chair of the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). His appointment follows a year in which the regulator approved all 36 mergers it reviewedâan outcome not seen since 2017.
Gurr first took on the role as interim chair in January 2024, replacing Marcus Bokkerink, who was removed over disagreements on competition policy. Business Secretary Peter Kyle has since backed Gurr's leadership qualities, calling it a sign that Britain is open to growth and investment.
Gurr's arrival at the CMA came after criticism from campaigners, who questioned his suitability due to his past role as Amazon UK's boss. Despite this, his first year saw notable changes to how the regulator handles mergers. The CMA streamlined its investigation process, focusing on speed, predictability, and proportionality.
Under his predecessor, Marcus Bokkerink, the CMA had taken a stricter approach to major deals. In 2023, it scrutinised Microsoft's proposed takeover of Activision Blizzard, eventually approving the deal only after Microsoft revised its terms. No such high-profile interventions have been recorded under Gurr's interim leadership.
The CMA has also adjusted its takeover policies in recent years to support economic expansion. In 2025, it greenlit every merger it reviewedâ36 in totalâwithout blocking a single one. This marked the first time since 2017 that the regulator had not opposed any proposed deals.
Gurr's initial appointment was temporary, but he will now serve a full five-year term. Business Secretary Peter Kyle has framed the decision as a clear message that the UK is committed to fostering business investment and development.
Gurr's confirmation as CMA chair comes after a year of significant shifts in merger oversight. With no blocked deals in 2025 and a revised approach to investigations, the regulator's direction appears focused on encouraging economic activity. His full term will begin after a period of interim leadership that saw no documented policy impacts on major technology firms.