Skip to content

UBS faces legal battle over Credit Suisse’s rushed takeover terms

Was Credit Suisse sold for pennies on the franc? Shareholders fight UBS in court, alleging a flawed valuation—and a cover-up of critical **docs**.

In this picture we can see a close view of the identity card. In the front we can see american flag...
In this picture we can see a close view of the identity card. In the front we can see american flag and "Critical Licence" written.

A legal dispute has erupted over UBS’s takeover of Credit Suisse, with 39 plaintiffs challenging the deal’s terms. They claim the bank’s shares were undervalued when the transaction was announced on 19 March 2023. The case centres on whether shareholders received fair compensation for their holdings.

At the heart of the issue is the exchange rate offered: one UBS share for every 22.48 Credit Suisse shares, valuing the entire bank at roughly 3 billion Swiss francs. Shareholders argue this amounted to just 76 rappen per share—far below what they believe the stock was worth at the time.

The Zurich Commercial Court appointed two independent experts, Peter Leibfried and Roger Neininger, to assess Credit Suisse’s true value on the day of the takeover. Their findings will play a key role in determining whether the compensation was fair. Meanwhile, UBS has sought to restrict plaintiffs’ access to internal documents, allowing them to review only materials already used by the experts.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs have criticised this move, calling it an unusual and excessive attempt to control information. They argue that full access to relevant documents is essential for a proper evaluation of the case. UBS has gone further, requesting that the court prohibit plaintiffs from sharing any inspected documents with the public or media, under threat of legal consequences.

The Commercial Court has already imposed restrictions on shareholders, barring them from making public statements about the takeover. Plaintiffs’ lawyers now have until the end of September to submit their arguments on document access rights. After that, the court will issue a final ruling on UBS’s request for limited disclosure.

The plaintiffs maintain that Credit Suisse shares were worth between 2 and over 9 Swiss francs on the day of the deal—significantly higher than the 76 rappen per share they received. Their case hinges on proving that the valuation process was flawed and that shareholders were short-changed in the rushed takeover.

The outcome of this dispute will determine whether the plaintiffs can access critical documents to support their claims. A decision from the Zurich Commercial Court is expected after September, once both sides have presented their arguments. The ruling could set a precedent for how future financial takeovers are scrutinised in Switzerland.

Read also: