Mecklenburg-Vorpommern's Controversial Spending: Calendars, Fish Ladders, and Parking Garages

Taxpayers' money is being questioned in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. From calendars to bike garages, is the state prioritizing right?

Mecklenburg-Vorpommern's Controversial Spending: Calendars, Fish Ladders, and Parking Garages

The state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern has faced criticism over its spending decisions, with some projects drawing controversy despite budget constraints. Taxpayers' money has been used for various initiatives, some of which have raised eyebrows among residents and experts.

The state spent 138,817.40 euros on producing and shipping 11,700 wall calendars, a decision that has been questioned given the tense budget situation. The daycare parents' council has criticized the inconsistent policy of using tax money for advertising while not prioritizing experienced educators.

The Ministry of Agriculture has insisted on the original plans for the fish ladder in Nebel, Dobbin-Linstow, which would cost at least 4.2 million euros. Local resistance and experts have suggested more cost-effective and less invasive alternatives. Meanwhile, the state capital Schwerin plans to build a bicycle parking garage near the main station for 3.2 million euros, despite traffic and safety concerns.

Two out of six entries from Mecklenburg-Vorpommern in the new Black Book of Taxpayers criticize advertising activities of the state. The online trading platform 'GoMeVo', launched during the Corona pandemic, cost around 1.5 million euros in tax money with little success. Furthermore, the MV Ministry of Agriculture has not adjusted a fee order for nine years, resulting in at least 100,000 euros per year not being collected.

The state's spending decisions have come under scrutiny, with some projects deemed unnecessary or inefficient. Critics argue that funds could be better spent on other areas, such as education and infrastructure. The Ministry of Agriculture's failure to adjust fees has also resulted in significant revenue losses. The state must reassess its priorities and ensure that taxpayers' money is used responsibly.